Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, getting a global score of 80.2 against 77.9. The Google Pixel design is newer, lighter and noticeably thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo. Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit more powerful CPU than Google Pixel, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have 4 cores, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a graphics co-processor.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a sharper display than Google Pixel, because it has a bit larger display, a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and more pixels per screen inch. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit better camera than Google Pixel, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a way better 20.7 mega pixels resolution back camera.
The Google Pixel counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 64 GB more internal storage. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 41 percent bigger battery size.
Although Google Pixel is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola DROID Turbo. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.