Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has a general score of 80.2, which is a bit better than the Moto G Stylus's global score of 79.7. The Google Pixel design is incredibly lighter and just a little thinner than the Moto G Stylus, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has 4 more CPU cores.
The Google Pixel counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a much smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a little bit greater amount of pixels per inch in the display. Moto G Stylus counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Moto G Stylus also has a bigger sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures, a camera with a much better resolution and a larger camera aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited environments.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a much better battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The Google Pixel not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.