Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is better than Google Pixel's 80.2 score. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a newer and just a little bit thinner device than the Google Pixel, but it is extremely heavier. Google Pixel counts with a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a way smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 62 percent more battery size. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G shoots way better photographs and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera, a larger aperture to take better photography in poorly lited environments and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor.
The Galaxy A71 5G costs more money than the Google Pixel, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.