Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2019-05-29 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 has a general score of 84.9, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel's overall score of 80.2. The Galaxy A80 construction is much newer than Google Pixel's, but it is just a little bit thicker and notably heavier. The Google Pixel features a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a way smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a quite better amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy A80's memory capacity to install games and applications is very similar to Google Pixel's one, they have the same 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A80 features a bit better processor than Google Pixel, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A80 features a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity instead of 2770mAh.
Galaxy A80 counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same aperture and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A80 also has a back facing camera with way more megapixels and a bigger camera sensor shooting higher quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.