Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android |
| 2016-10-20 | 2019-09-04 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is much better than the Google Pixel, having a 90.5 score against 80.2. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is a a lot newer and just a little bit thinner cellphone than the Google Pixel, but it is also a lot heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel, because it has a larger amount of RAM and more CPU cores.
Google Pixel features a slightly better screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a way smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a little higher display pixel density. Galaxy A90 5G shoots much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel, and although they both have a F2 aperture, the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much better 48 MP resolution back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a way better battery life than Google Pixel, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2770mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.