Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-10-20 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro has an overall score of 81, which is a bit better than Google Pixel's overall score of 80.2. Even though Galaxy C9 Pro and the Google Pixel were released only a couple months apart, the Galaxy C9 Pro construction is thinner but way heavier than the Google Pixel. The Google Pixel features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, the Google Pixel also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy C9 Pro has a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel, because it has a higher number of cores and 2 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 256 GB.
Google Pixel features a little bit better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos and videos in poorly lited situations and a camera in the back with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Galaxy C9 Pro features a way better battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 44% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.