Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel is slightly better than the vivo X60 Pro, with an 80.2 score against 78.8. Google Pixel's construction is notably lighter than the vivo X60 Pro, although it's thicker and was released many years before. The vivo X60 Pro features a better hardware performance than Google Pixel, because it has a higher amount of RAM and 4 more cpu cores.
Vivo X60 Pro and Google Pixel count with similar displays, because although the vivo X60 Pro has a little worse display density, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution and a really larger display. Vivo X60 Pro shoots a lot better photos and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also has faster 60 fps video frame rate, a much better resolution back-facing camera, a bigger aperture and a bigger sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a much greater memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel, because it has more internal memory. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a way better battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 52% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.