Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| 2019-05-21 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P is a bit better than the Honor 20 Pro, getting a global score of 80.3 against 73.2. Google Nexus 6P's construction is thinner and a little bit lighter than the Honor 20 Pro, although it was released many years before. The Google Nexus 6P counts with a little bit better looking screen than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher pixel density.
The Honor 20 Pro counts with a little bit better processing power than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor 20 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Honor 20 Pro counts with a superior storage to install applications and games than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Honor 20 Pro features a better camera than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Honor 20 Pro also has a way larger diafragm aperture for better photos in low light situations, a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures and a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Honor 20 Pro has just a bit longer battery life than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 16% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.