Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| 2019-05-21 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a global score of 81.6, which is better than Honor 20 Pro's 73.2 general score. Despite of the fact that Google Pixel 2 is older than the Honor 20 Pro, it's body is noticeably lighter and a little bit thinner. The Honor 20 Pro has a bit more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 20 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit more vivid display than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a way smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher count of pixels in each screen inch. The Honor 20 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 2, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Honor 20 Pro features a superior camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Honor 20 Pro also has a lot larger back camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality, a way better resolution back camera and a way bigger aperture to take better low light photos and video.
Honor 20 Pro has a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.