Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-05-21 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Droid Turbo is a little bit better than the Honor 20 Pro, with a 76.4 score against 73.2. The Motorola Droid Turbo is a way older and much thicker cellphone than the Honor 20 Pro, but Motorola was able to build it a little lighter anyway. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a processor that's just as good as the processor in Honor 20 Pro, because although the Motorola Droid Turbo has lesser RAM and 4 lesser cpu cores , it also counts with an extra GPU.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a sharper display than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels amount per inch in the screen and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. Honor 20 Pro features a superior camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same video quality, the Honor 20 Pro also has a lot better resolution back facing camera, a way bigger aperture to capture better low-light photography and higher 30 fps video frame rate.
The Honor 20 Pro features much more memory for apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal storage. Honor 20 Pro counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.