Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-05-21 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo has an overall score of 77.9, which is a little bit better than Honor 20 Pro's 73.2 general score. Despite of the fact Motorola DROID Turbo is notably older and much thicker than the Honor 20 Pro, it's body is still just a little bit lighter. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a more vivid display than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Honor 20 Pro features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a processing unit that's just as good as the Honor 20 Pro one, because although the Motorola DROID Turbo has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit.
The Honor 20 Pro features just a little better battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Honor 20 Pro shoots better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Honor 20 Pro also has a back facing camera with a way higher resolution, a much larger aperture for better photography in low light environments and higher video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.