Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-21 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 is better than the Honor 20 Pro, having a general score of 81.2 against 73.2. The Motorola Edge 50 design is way newer, a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than Honor 20 Pro. The Motorola Edge 50 has a brighter display than Honor 20 Pro, because it has a little bigger display, a slightly higher 1220 x 2712 resolution and a quite higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
The Honor 20 Pro and the Motorola Edge 50 count with similar storage capacity for applications and games, both of them have the same internal storage. Honor 20 Pro has a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50. They have 8 CPU cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. The Honor 20 Pro and the Motorola Edge 50 both count with incredibly similar cameras, because although the Motorola Edge 50 has a way tinier camera aperture which is worse for taking pictures and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, it also counts with a more mega pixels back-facing camera and a lot larger sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs and videos.
The Motorola Edge 50 has greater battery performance than Honor 20 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.