Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android |
| 2019-05-21 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 409 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is much better than Honor 20 Pro, getting an 84.7 score against 73.2. The Galaxy A32 design is newer, but just a little bit thicker and heavier than Honor 20 Pro. The Honor 20 Pro has a bit better processing power than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 20 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The Honor 20 Pro counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher pixels amount per inch of screen and a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Honor 20 Pro has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same resolution back camera, the Honor 20 Pro also has a way larger diafragm aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited situations.
Honor 20 Pro features just a bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A32, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A32 features improved battery duration than Honor 20 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.