Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android |
| 2019-05-21 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G has a general score of 90.5, which is much better than Honor 20 Pro's score of 73.2. Galaxy A90 5G is a heavier cellphone than the Honor 20 Pro, but both of them are equally thin. Honor 20 Pro features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a little greater number of pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit more storage to install applications and games than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit better processing unit than Honor 20 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A90 5G and Honor 20 Pro both feature extremely similar cameras, and although the Galaxy A90 5G has a much smaller camera aperture which is not nice for shooting photos in low light situations, they both have the same video resolution, the same resolution back camera, the same video frame rates and a 0.5 inches back-facing camera sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with just a bit longer battery life than Honor 20 Pro, because it has a 13 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.