Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-05-21 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is better than Honor 20 Pro, getting a general score of 81 against 73.2. Despite of the fact the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is notably older and a little bit heavier than the Honor 20 Pro, it's construction is still somewhat thinner. Honor 20 Pro features a little bit better screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite bigger display, a bit higher display density and a bit higher 1080 x 2340px resolution.
The Honor 20 Pro has a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Honor 20 Pro has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Honor 20 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy C9 Pro's battery duration is just as good as the Honor 20 Pro one. Honor 20 Pro takes greater photographs and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a much larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.