Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-21 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a bit better than Honor 20 Pro, having a 77.8 score against 73.2. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a noticeably newer and thinner phone than the Honor 20 Pro, although it is also heavier. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better looking screen than Honor 20 Pro, because it has a much higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution, a quite higher pixels density and a bigger screen.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Honor 20 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal memory. Honor 20 Pro features a very superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a better camera than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a way larger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a camera with more mega pixels. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a really longer battery lifetime than Honor 20 Pro, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.