Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-05-31 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.43 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Green, Pink and Silver | Smoke black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 480.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2700 x 1224 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 436 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 4000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 SM8635 (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 735 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Power is slightly better than the Honor 200 Pro, with a global score of 76.1 against 69.3. Moto G Power's design has the same weight than the Honor 200 Pro, but it is somewhat thicker. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Moto G Power has 11 version while Honor 200 Pro has Android 14 version.
Honor 200 Pro counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has a just a bit greater count of pixels in each screen inch, a little bit larger display and a little bit higher 1224 x 2700 resolution. The Honor 200 Pro features more storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto G Power, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Moto G Power features an extremely better processing unit than Honor 200 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and also faster). The Honor 200 Pro features a bit longer battery duration than Moto G Power, because it has a 5200mAh battery size.
The Honor 200 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Honor 200 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Motorola Moto G Power is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.