Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.3 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-05-31 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.43 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black, Green, Pink and Silver | Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 480.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2700 x 1224 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 436 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 4000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 SM8635 (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 735 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto Z4 is better than the Honor 200 Pro, having a overall score of 79.8 against 69.3. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Moto Z4 has older 10 version and Honor 200 Pro has Android 14. Despite of the fact that the Moto Z4 is extremely older than the Honor 200 Pro, it's body is a bit thinner and somewhat lighter.
The Moto Z4 counts with a very superior processor than Honor 200 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores. Honor 200 Pro counts with a way better display than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1224 x 2700, a little bit greater pixels density and a bit bigger screen.
The Moto Z4 has just a bit more memory to store more games and applications than Honor 200 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Honor 200 Pro features a much better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has 5200mAh of battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Honor 200 Pro has a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Honor 200 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with more mega-pixels and a lot larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Motorola Moto Z4 is a little more expensive than the Honor 200 Pro, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.