Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-05-31 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.43 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Black, Green, Pink and Silver | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 480.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2700 x 1224 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 436 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 4000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 SM8635 (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 735 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 has a general score of 87.1, which is way better than the Honor 200 Pro's score of 69.3. Galaxy Note9 is an extremely older, just a little thicker and a bit heavier cellphone than Honor 200 Pro. The Honor 200 Pro features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a quite lower quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a bit worse 1224 x 2700 resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
The Galaxy Note9 features just a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Honor 200 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy Note9 features a much greater processing power than Honor 200 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with 7 more CPU cores.
The Honor 200 Pro has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a lot tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Honor 200 Pro also counts with a lot larger sensor providing a lot better image quality and a back camera with way more MP.
Honor 200 Pro has superior battery duration than Galaxy Note9, because it has 5200mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Honor 200 Pro, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.