Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P has a general score of 80.3, which is just a bit better than the Honor 50 Pro's score of 77. Despite of the fact that Google Nexus 6P is much older than Honor 50 Pro, it's design is just a bit thinner and a little lighter. Honor 50 Pro features a little better processing power than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor 50 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Google Nexus 6P has a bit sharper display than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per display inch and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Honor 50 Pro features a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Google Nexus 6P, because it has more internal storage.
Honor 50 Pro has a bit better battery life than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. The Honor 50 Pro shoots way better pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Honor 50 Pro also has a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back and a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.