Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is slightly better than the Honor 50 Pro, having a global score of 81.6 against 77. Google Pixel 2's body has the same thickness than Honor 50 Pro, but it's much lighter. The Honor 50 Pro has just a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor 50 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a screen that's just as good as the display in Honor 50 Pro, because although the Google Pixel 2 has a way worse 1080 x 1920 resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixel density. The Honor 50 Pro counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because it has more internal memory capacity.
Honor 50 Pro shoots way better photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for taking photos or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a much higher resolution back camera.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a superior battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.