Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL is just a bit better than Honor 50 Pro, getting a general score of 81.3 against 77. Google Pixel XL is a much older and just a little thicker phone than Honor 50 Pro, but Google could make it somewhat lighter anyway. The Google Pixel XL features a little bit better looking screen than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a just a bit better pixel density.
Honor 50 Pro counts with a much bigger memory for apps and games than Google Pixel XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Honor 50 Pro has a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel XL, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and 4 more CPU cores. Honor 50 Pro has a little better battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Honor 50 Pro takes way better photographs and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Honor 50 Pro also has a camera in the back with a way better resolution and a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.