Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black and Blue |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo is a bit better than the Honor 50 Pro, with a 77.9 score against 77. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola DROID Turbo has a newer 4.4.4 version while Honor 50 Pro has Android 11. Despite of the fact the Motorola DROID Turbo is notably older and noticeably thicker than the Honor 50 Pro, it's construction is still a bit lighter.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a little better processing power than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has less cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a brighter screen than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a quite better resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal storage. Honor 50 Pro has just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. Honor 50 Pro features a much better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Honor 50 Pro also has a lot better 108 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, better 30 fps video frame rates and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.