Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 440 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has an overall score of 91.8, which is better than the Honor 50 Pro's general score of 77. Both devices in this comparison include the same Android 11 OS, so they should count with identical operating system features. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is an older and a little thicker cellphone than the Honor 50 Pro, but Samsung was able to build it just a little bit lighter anyway.
Honor 50 Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. Honor 50 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Honor 50 Pro also has a quite better resolution of 1236 x 2676 pixels and a quite better pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a lot less mega-pixels back facing camera and a lower (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in low light situations.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a bigger storage to store more games and applications than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G features a little better battery duration than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.