Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 has a general score of 87.1, which is better than the Honor 50 Pro's general score of 77. Although it's the best in our current comparison, the Galaxy Note9 design is noticeably older, a bit heavier and thicker than the Honor 50 Pro. Galaxy Note9 has just a little better processing power than Honor 50 Pro, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy Note9 features a bit better screen than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a quite higher pixels density. Honor 50 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a way tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and video in low-light environments and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher 108 mega-pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has just a bit more storage for applications and games than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy Note9's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery performance in Honor 50 Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.