Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 440 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than the Honor 50 Pro, with a global score of 80.1 against 77. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and Honor 50 Pro has Android 11 version, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features. Even being the best cellphone in our current comparison, we must highlight that it's also older, incredibly thicker and incredibly heavier.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit more vivid screen than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixel number in each inch of display. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a CPU that is just as good as Honor 50 Pro's processing unit, and although the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Honor 50 Pro takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting images or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot higher video definition and a way higher 108 MP resolution back camera.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 13% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.