Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro has a general score of 78.8, which is slightly better than Honor 50 Pro's overall score of 77. The vivo X60 Pro construction is a bit lighter and just a little thinner than Honor 50 Pro, even though both of them were released only 3 months apart. Both phones in this comparison include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit superior processor than Honor 50 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM. Honor 50 Pro has just a bit better looking screen than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a little bit higher 1236 x 2676 pixels resolution, a little bit more pixels per inch in the display and a quite bigger screen.
The Honor 50 Pro features a slightly better camera than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking images in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Vivo X60 Pro features as much storage for games and applications as the Honor 50 Pro, both have equal internal storage capacity. The vivo X60 Pro has a little better battery performance than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 5 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.