Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Black, Blue and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL is much better than Honor 50 SE, having a score of 81.3 against 73.7. Google Pixel XL's design is lighter than the Honor 50 SE, although it's a little thicker and was released many years before. Google Pixel XL counts with a little more vivid display than Honor 50 SE, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch of display.
Google Pixel XL features as much storage to install games and applications as Honor 50 SE, both have the same 128 GB internal storage. The Honor 50 SE counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4 GB more RAM and more processing cores. Honor 50 SE has a way better camera than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Honor 50 SE also has a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos and a back-facing camera with a lot better 108 MP resolution.
The Honor 50 SE has just a little better battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 16 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.