Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 385 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 has an overall score of 77.7, which is a little bit better than the Honor 50 SE's general score of 73.7. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the HTC One M9 has the older 5.0 version and Honor 50 SE has Android 11. HTC One M9 is a older and thicker phone than Honor 50 SE, but HTC managed to make it lighter anyway.
The HTC One M9 features a more vivid screen than Honor 50 SE, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display. The Honor 50 SE features much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The HTC One M9 has a little better hardware performance than Honor 50 SE, because although it has less RAM memory, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bits CPU and an extra graphics processor. Honor 50 SE features a really longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 41 percent bigger battery capacity.
Honor 50 SE takes much clearer photos and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Honor 50 SE also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures and video and a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.