Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 has a general score of 84.9, which is better than Honor 50 SE's 73.7 general score. Although it's the best in this comparison review, we must note that it's also older, heavier and thicker. The Honor 50 SE has just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A80. Both have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM.
Galaxy A80 has a display that's just as good as the Honor 50 SE one, because although the Galaxy A80 has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixels density and a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. Honor 50 SE has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Honor 50 SE also has a back facing camera with a lot higher 108 megapixels resolution and a bigger camera aperture for better captures in low-light environments.
Galaxy A80's storage capacity to install games and applications is very similar to Honor 50 SE's one, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Honor 50 SE counts with a little longer battery performance than Galaxy A80, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.