Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P is slightly better than Honor 50, having a overall score of 80.3 against 74.5. Google Nexus 6P's construction is just a little bit thinner than Honor 50, but it's a little heavier and was released many years before. Google Nexus 6P features a little sharper display than Honor 50, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per inch in the display.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with as much memory capacity for games and applications as the Honor 50, both have exactly the same internal storage capacity. The Honor 50 features a bit faster CPU than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 50 also has more RAM memory.
Honor 50 counts with superior battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity. Honor 50 shoots greater photographs and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Honor 50 also has a larger camera aperture to take better low-light images and videos and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.