Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-06-25 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black and Gold |
| Glass and Metal | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro has a general score of 81, which is just a bit better than Honor 50's overall score of 74.5. Galaxy C9 Pro's body is a little bit thinner than Honor 50, although it's a little heavier and was released 4 years before. Both phones in this comparison work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy C9 Pro has a more recent 6.0 Marshmallow version while Honor 50 has Android 11 version, giving you lots of additional features and increased performance.
Honor 50 has just a bit better screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little larger screen, a little bit more pixels per screen inch and a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Honor 50 counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor 50 also has more RAM.
Honor 50 has a much better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a F1.9 aperture, the Honor 50 also has a much higher video quality and a back camera with much more mega pixels. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a little bit better storage capacity for apps and games than Honor 50, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 256 GB.
Honor 50 features a little longer battery performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has an 8% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.