Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-06-25 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30s is much better than the Honor 50, with an 83.3 score against 74.5. Even being the best phone we are comparing here, it must be noted that it's also an older, somewhat thicker and a little bit heavier phone. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect.
Honor 50 features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 50 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy M30s has a little more vivid screen than Honor 50, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy M30s also counts with a just a bit higher pixels density.
Honor 50 shoots clearer videos and photos than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Honor 50 also has a back camera with a lot higher 108 mega pixels resolution and a larger aperture to take better low-light photography and video.
Galaxy M30s has a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Honor 50, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy M30s has a much longer battery life than Honor 50, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.