Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than Honor 50's 74.5 score. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a newer and way thinner device than the Honor 50, although it is heavier. Both devices in this review have Android OS (operating system), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a more recent 14 version and Honor 50 has Android 11, giving you a couple nice extra features.
Honor 50 counts with a much better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better screen than Honor 50, because it has a larger screen, a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a just a little better display density.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior memory for apps and games than Honor 50, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features improved battery duration than Honor 50, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Honor 50, because although it has a back-facing camera with lot less mega-pixels, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better images in low-light environments and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.