Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 59.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-10-25 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.94 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 655 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3340mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is much better than Honor 6x's 59.7 score. LG V50 ThinQ's design is notably newer than Honor 6x's, although it is heavier and just a little thicker. LG V50 ThinQ has a bit sharper display than Honor 6x, because it has a bigger screen, a higher count of pixels per inch of display and a much higher 1440 x 3120px resolution.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better processing power than Honor 6x, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 3 GB more RAM. The LG V50 ThinQ captures way better photos and videos than Honor 6x, and although they both have a back camera with a 12 MP resolution, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a bigger camera sensor, a way larger camera aperture for better low-light images and videos and a way better video definition.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Honor 6x, because it has a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal storage. The LG V50 ThinQ has improved battery lifetime than Honor 6x, because it has a 20% more battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the LG V50 ThinQ is also cheaper than the Honor 6x, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.