Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.3 | 73.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2 |
| 2018-10-10 | 2013-08-07 |
| 6.31 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.45 x 2.79 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 159.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G51 MP4 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.74 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.40 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.3 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3750mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 696 hours standby time 17.9 hours talk time |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG G2 is slightly better than Honor 8X, getting a 73.7 score against 67.3. The LG G2 is an a lot older and thicker cellphone than the Honor 8X, but LG managed to make it somewhat lighter anyway. LG G2 has a bit better hardware performance than Honor 8X, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and less processing cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processor.
LG G2 has a much better screen than Honor 8X, because although it has a really smaller screen and a little bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of display. Honor 8X features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G2, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Honor 8X captures slightly better photos and videos than LG G2, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Honor 8X also has a much higher 20 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a lot larger camera aperture to take better images in low light situations.
The Honor 8X has better battery duration than LG G2, because it has a 3750mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the LG G2 is also cheaper than the other phone, making it easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.