Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-17 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has a score of 80.2, which is much better than the Honor 9X Pro's 71.9 overall score. Google Pixel's construction is a little thinner and way lighter than the Honor 9X Pro, even though it was released 4 years before. Honor 9X Pro counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Google Pixel, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and more cpu cores.
Google Pixel has a little bit better screen than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a lot smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display. Honor 9X Pro features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB and 128 GB more internal memory.
The Honor 9X Pro features a superior camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Honor 9X Pro also has a bigger camera aperture for better photography and videos in low light situations, better 60 fps video frame rate, a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera with a way higher 48 megapixels resolution.
Honor 9X Pro has a way better battery life than Google Pixel, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.