Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-17 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is better than the Honor 9X Pro, having an 82.5 score against 71.9. Google Pixel 2 XL's design is lighter and somewhat thinner than the Honor 9X Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. Google Pixel 2 XL and Honor 9X Pro both feature quite similar CPUs, and although the Google Pixel 2 XL has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Google Pixel 2 XL has just a bit better looking display than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px. Honor 9X Pro counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB and more internal storage capacity.
The Honor 9X Pro takes much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Honor 9X Pro also has a back camera with a way better 48 MP resolution, higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a way larger camera sensor.
The Honor 9X Pro counts with a little longer battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.