Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-17 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is better than the Honor 9X Pro's 71.9 score. Although Google Pixel 3 is older than the Honor 9X Pro, it's design is notably lighter and thinner. Google Pixel 3 has just a bit better screen than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px, it also counts with a bit higher pixel count in each inch in the screen.
The Google Pixel 3 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Honor 9X Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Honor 9X Pro has a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Honor 9X Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the Honor 9X Pro also has a back-facing camera with a much better resolution, a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and better video frame rate.
Honor 9X Pro features a much better battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.