Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-17 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has a global score of 78.8, which is slightly better than Honor 9X Pro's general score of 71.9. These phones include Android OS, but Google Pixel 3a has a newer 11 version while Honor 9X Pro has Android 10 version. Even though the Google Pixel 3a is older than the Honor 9X Pro, it's design is a little bit thinner and much lighter.
Honor 9X Pro features a bit more powerful processor than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 9X Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. Google Pixel 3a counts with a bit sharper screen than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2220 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch.
Honor 9X Pro counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB and 256 GB internal memory capacity. Honor 9X Pro has better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Honor 9X Pro takes better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same aperture, the Honor 9X Pro also has a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality, higher 60 fps video frame rate and a way more MP back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.