Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-17 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL is a little bit better than the Honor 9X Pro, with a 78.9 score against 71.9. Google Pixel 3a XL's design is just a little thinner and lighter than Honor 9X Pro, despite of the fact that it was released only 12 months before. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 3a XL has newer 11 version and Honor 9X Pro has Android 10 version.
The Google Pixel 3a XL and Honor 9X Pro both have incredibly similar displays, because although the Google Pixel 3a XL has a little bit smaller screen and a little lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixels density. Honor 9X Pro has a bit superior processor than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor 9X Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
Honor 9X Pro features a much better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same video resolution and a same size aperture, the Honor 9X Pro also has a back-facing camera with lot more MP, higher video frame rates and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and pictures.
The Honor 9X Pro has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 192 GB more internal storage and a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Honor 9X Pro has a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.