Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-17 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is much better than the Honor 9X Pro, having a overall score of 81.9 against 71.9. Although Google Pixel 4 and the Honor 9X Pro were released only 6 months apart, Google Pixel 4 is a little bit thinner and noticeably lighter. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Honor 9X Pro. They have a Octa-Core processor and 6 GB of RAM.
Google Pixel 4 features a bit better looking display than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per display inch. Honor 9X Pro has a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Honor 9X Pro has a better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Honor 9X Pro also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures, higher video frame rates and a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Honor 9X Pro has a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.