Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-17 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a global score of 82.9, which is much better than the Honor 9X Pro's 71.9 score. Although Google Pixel 4 XL and Honor 9X Pro were released only a couple months apart, Google Pixel 4 XL is just a little lighter and just a little thinner. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit sharper screen than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution and a better pixels density.
Honor 9X Pro features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. The Google Pixel 4 XL has just a little better processing power than Honor 9X Pro. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The Honor 9X Pro counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. The Honor 9X Pro features a better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Honor 9X Pro also counts with a lot better resolution camera, better video frame rates and a lot larger back camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.