Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-17 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is better than Honor 9X Pro, getting an 82.9 score against 71.9. Google Pixel 4a's construction is just a bit thinner and incredibly lighter than Honor 9X Pro, even though both of them were only released 4 months apart. These devices work with Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 4a has the newer 11 version and Honor 9X Pro has Android 10.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a little more vivid display than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a quite higher screen density. The Google Pixel 4a's processor is very similar to the CPU in Honor 9X Pro, they have a 6 GB RAM and 8 processing cores.
The Honor 9X Pro counts with a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB and 256 GB internal storage. The Honor 9X Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Honor 9X Pro also counts with a way more megapixels back camera, better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs.
Honor 9X Pro features better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 27 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.