Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-17 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is much better than the Honor 9X Pro's global score of 71.9. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has the newer 11 version and Honor 9X Pro has Android 10 version, so it counts with some extra features and better performance. Google Pixel 4a 5G's design is just a little thinner and somewhat lighter than the Honor 9X Pro, although both were released with only a few months difference.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little faster CPU than Honor 9X Pro. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 6 GB RAM. Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit sharper screen than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a just a little higher display pixels density.
Honor 9X Pro has a superior memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB. Honor 9X Pro takes clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Honor 9X Pro also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor and a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
The Honor 9X Pro counts with just a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.