Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-17 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a global score of 89, which is a lot better than the Honor 9X Pro's 71.9 general score. Google Pixel 5 is a noticeably lighter and thinner phone than the Honor 9X Pro, even though both of them were released only a couple months apart. The Google Pixel 5 has a little bit better screen than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340px resolution, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a bit higher number of pixels per inch in the screen.
Google Pixel 5 has a little bit better performance than Honor 9X Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger amount of RAM. Honor 9X Pro counts with a bit better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photography, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Honor 9X Pro also counts with a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
The Honor 9X Pro counts with much more memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 5, because it has 128 GB more internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit superior battery duration than Honor 9X Pro, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.