Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-04-17 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 390 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is just a bit better than Honor 9X Pro, having a global score of 77.7 against 71.9. Although HTC One M9 is noticeably older and just a little bit thicker than the Honor 9X Pro, it's design is still notably lighter. These devices use Android operating system, but HTC One M9 has 5.0 version and Honor 9X Pro has Android 10.
The HTC One M9 counts with a bit better performance than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bits processor and an extra GPU. HTC One M9 features a more vivid display than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen and a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per display inch.
The Honor 9X Pro features a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB and 256 GB internal memory. Honor 9X Pro counts with a little bit better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Honor 9X Pro also has a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels, higher video frame rates, a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture to capture better low light photos and videos.
The Honor 9X Pro has a way better battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.