Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-04-17 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ has an overall score of 81, which is better than Honor 9X Pro's 71.9 overall score. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but LG G7 ThinQ has newer 9.0 Pie version while Honor 9X Pro has Android 10 version, providing the user some extra features. LG G7 ThinQ's construction is thinner and noticeably lighter than the Honor 9X Pro, although it was released just a little over a year before.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a way better looking display than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better 1440 x 3120px resolution. The Honor 9X Pro has a better memory for games and applications than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Honor 9X Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Honor 9X Pro counts with a bit better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Honor 9X Pro also counts with a lot bigger sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality and a way higher resolution camera in the back.
The Honor 9X Pro counts with improved battery duration than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.