Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-17 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ has a general score of 82.7, which is much better than the Honor 9X Pro's 71.9 general score. The LG G8X ThinQ body is a bit lighter and a little thinner than Honor 9X Pro, even when they were released only 6 months apart. Both devices we compare here work with the same Android 10 operating system.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit superior CPU than Honor 9X Pro. Both have a Octa-Core processor and a 6 GB RAM. LG G8X ThinQ counts with just a bit better display than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the LG G8X ThinQ also counts with a just a bit better pixels density.
Honor 9X Pro has just a bit better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the same video frame rate and a F1.8 aperture, the Honor 9X Pro also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality photos and a camera with a much higher 48 MP resolution.
The Honor 9X Pro has slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB more internal memory capacity. LG G8X ThinQ features a battery performance that is very similar to the battery performance in Honor 9X Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.