Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-04-17 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is better than Honor 9X Pro, getting an 82.5 score against 71.9. Both of these phones use Android OS, but LG V30S ThinQ has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and Honor 9X Pro has Android 10. LG V30S ThinQ's design is notably lighter and somewhat thinner than Honor 9X Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 2 years before.
The LG V30S ThinQ features just a bit better looking screen than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a greater pixel count per display inch. The Honor 9X Pro features a slightly better storage to install games and applications than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit better performance than Honor 9X Pro. Both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. The Honor 9X Pro counts with a better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Honor 9X Pro also counts with better 60 fps video frame rate, a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a lot larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Honor 9X Pro features improved battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.